Mani
- founder of Manichaeaism
Naz
site - Site dedicated
to Nazoreans
Forum-
Nazorean Forum
Order
of Nazorean
Essenes

|
Diamond Sutra from Dunhunag Library
Diamond
Sutra
"The followers of the sect (Manichaean)
also chant the Diamond Sutra . .."
Manicheism in
China by Lieu
The Diamond Sutra
Translated
by Charles Muller
1. Convocation
of the Assembly
Thus I have heard.
Once, the Buddha was staying in the Jetavana Grove in ?r?vast? with a community
of 1250
monks. Then,
at mealtime, the World Honored One put on his robe, took his bowl, and
went into the great city of
?r?vast? to seek
alms food, going from house to house within the city. Finishing, he returned
home and took his
meal. He then
put away his robe and bowl, washed his feet, arranged his seat, and sat
down.
2. Where should
practitioners abide mentally, and how should they control their thoughts?
The elder Subh?ti,
who was in the great assembly, then arose from his seat, stood up, bared
his right shoulder,
kneeled down
with his right knee, clasped his hands together and respectfully addressed
the Buddha, saying: "How
rare is the World
Honored One! The Tath?gata is well mindful of all the bodhisattvas; he
keeps them well in his
fold.World Honored
One, when good sons and good daughters seek peerless perfect enlightenment,
in what should
they abide, and
how should they subdue their thoughts?"
The Buddha said,
"Excellent! Excellent! Subh?ti, it is as you have said. The Tath?gata is
well mindful of all the
bodhisattvas,
and is skilful at keeping them in his fold. Now you listen well, and I
shall explain it for you."
"If good sons
and good daughters would like to arouse the mind of peerless perfect enlightenment,
they should
abide like this
and subdue their thoughts like this."
The Venerable
Subh?ti said: "Yes, please do so, World Honored One. We are listening with
great anticipation."
3. The Bodhisattva's
Vow
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti: "The bodhisattvas and mah?sattvas should subdue their thoughts
like this: All the
different types
of sentient beings, whether they be born from eggs, born from a womb, born
from moisture or born
spontaneously;
whether or not they have form; whether they abide in perceptions or no
perceptions; or without
either perceptions
or non-perceptions, I save them by causing them to enter nirvana without
remainder. And when
these immeasurable,
countless, infinite number of sentient beings have been liberated, in actuality,
no sentient
being has attained
liberation. Why is this so? Subh?ti, If a bodhisattva abides in the signs
of self, person, sentient
being, or life-span,
she or he is not a bodhisattva."
4. Unattached
practice of charity
"Furthermore Subh?ti,
when bodhisattvas practice charity, they should not abide [in the notion
that they are
practicing charity].
This is what is called 'practicing charity while not abiding in form,'
and 'practicing charity while
not abiding in
sound, odor, taste, touch, or conceptions.' Why? If bodhisattvas practice
charity while not abiding in
signs of charity,
their merit will be incalculable. Subh?ti, what do you think? The space
in the easterly direction is
incalculable,
is it not?"
"You are right,
World Honored One, it is not calculable."
"Subh?ti, is
all of the space in the four cardinal directions, the four intermediate
directions, the zenith, and the
nadir calculable?"
"It is incalculable,
World Honored One."
"Subh?ti, the
merits attained by bodhisattvas who practice charity without abiding in
its signs are also incalculable
like this. Subh?ti,
the bodhisattvas need only focus themselves on this teaching."
5. Physical Characteristics
of Buddhahood
"Subh?ti, what
do you say? Can one discern the Tath?gata by means of his bodily characteristics?"
"No, World Honored
One. One cannot see the Tath?gata by means of bodily characteristics. Why
not? The bodily
characteristics
taught by the Tath?gata are actually not bodily characteristics." The Buddha
said to Subh?ti: "All
things that have
characteristics are false and ephemeral. If you see all characteristics
to be non-characteristics,
then you see
the Tath?gata."
6. The merit of
true faith
Subh?ti addressed
the Buddha, saying: "World Honored One, will there be sentient beings who
are able, upon
hearing these
words and sentences, to give rise to true faith?"
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti, "Do not even say such a thing. Five hundred lifetimes after
my passing away, there
will be those
who observe moral discipline and cultivate merit, who will be able to give
rise to the mental state of
faith and take
these words to be the truth. You should know that these people have not
merely cultivated virtuous
roots with one
buddha, two buddhas, three, four, or five buddhas. They have cultivated
all kinds of virtuous roots
with countless
hundreds of thousands of buddhas. Hearing these passages, in a single moment
they give rise to
pure faith. Subh?ti,
the Tath?gata fully knows and fully sees these sentient beings as they
attain these countless
merits."
Why is this? It
is because these sentient beings do not again [abide in] the notions of
self, person, sentient being, or
life span. Nor
do they abide in the notions of the dharma, or the notions of non-dharma.
Why? If these sentient
beings their
minds grasp to these notions, then they will cling to self, person, sentient
being, and life-span. If they
grasp to the
notions of phenomena, they will attach to self, person, sentient being,
and life span. Why? If they grasp
to the denial
of phenomena, then they will attach to self, person, sentient being, and
life span. Therefore one should
not grasp to
phenomena, and one should not deny phenomena. Expressing this, the Tath?gata
always teaches:
'Monks, understand
my correct teachings to be like a raft.' If even my correct teachings are
to be abandoned, how
much more incorrect
teachings?
7. No attainment,
no teaching
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Tath?gata attain peerless perfect enlightenment?
And does he have a
teaching that
he explains?"
Subh?ti said:
"As I understand the implications of what the Buddha has explained, there
is no determinable
phenomenon called
peerless perfect enlightenment. And there is also no set teaching that
can be delivered by the
Tath?gata. Why?
The teachings explained by the Tath?gata can neither be appropriated nor
explained. There is
neither a teaching
nor a non-teaching. How can this be? All the enlightened sages are distinguished
[from worldly
teachers] by
indeterminate phenomena."
8. Real merit
has no merit
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? If a person were to fill a chiliocosm with the seven kinds
of jewels and give them away
charitably, wouldn't
the merit attained by this person be great?"
Subh?ti said,
"Extremely great, World Honored One. And why? This merit has no nature
of merit; therefore the
tath?gata says
that this merit is great."
The Buddha said:
"But if there were a person well-attentive to this s?tra such that he or
she could teach a four line
verse from it
to others, this person's merit would exceed that of the former example.
Why? Subh?ti, all of the
buddhas and all
of their teachings of peerless perfect enlightenment spring forth from
this s?tra. Subh?ti, that which
is called the
buddhadharma is not the buddhadharma."
9. The four lesser
vehicle realizations
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does a practitioner who has attained the level of srota-?panna
think: 'I have attained
the realization
of the srota-?panna?' "
Subh?ti said,
"No, World Honored One. And why not? Because the name srota-?panna means
'stream-enterer,'
and there is
in fact no stream to be entered. One does not enter form, sound, odor,
taste, touch, or concepts.
Therefore one
is called a srota-?panna."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does a sak?d?g?min think, 'I have attained the realization
of sak?d?g?min?' "
Subh?ti said:
"No, World Honored One. And why not? Although the name sak?d?g?min means
to go and come one
[more time],
there is, in reality, no going or coming. Therefore he is called a sak?d?g?min."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the adept who has attained the level of an?g?min say,
'I have achieved the
realization of
the an?g?min?' "
Subh?ti said,
"No, World Honored One. And why not? An?g?min means non-returning [to this
world], but there is,
in fact, no such
thing as returning. Therefore this person is called an an?g?min."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the arhat think, 'I have attained the realization of
the arhat?' "
"No, World Honored
One. And why not? There is, in reality, no such a thing called 'arhat.'
World Honored One, if
an arhat should
give rise to the thought, 'I have attained the realization of the arhat,
this would mean that he is
attached to the
notions of self, person, sentient being, and life span.' "
"World Honored
One, you have said that I am the most proficient in terms of the attainment
of the meditative
absorption of
no-contention, and that I am the arhat most free from the desire. But I
do not give rise to the thought
that I am an
arhat who is free from desire. World Honored One, if I were to give rise
to the thought that I have
attained the
level of the arhat, then you would not said of me that I enjoy the practice
of forest-dwelling, since there
is in actuality
nothing for me to practice. Therefore I am called 'Subh?ti, the one who
enjoys the practice of
forest-dwelling.'
"
10. Arousing the
pure aspiration without abiding
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti, "What do you think? When the tath?gata studied under D?pa?kara
Buddha, did he
gain any attainment
in the dharma?"
"World Honored
One, when the Tath?gata studied under D?pa?kara Buddha, there was, in reality,
nothing that he
attained in the
dharma."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Buddha create sublime Buddha-lands?"
"No, he does
not, World Honored One. And why not? Sublime Buddha-lands are not sublime.
Therefore they care
called sublime."
"And so, Subh?ti,
the bodhisattvas and mahasattvas should give rise to the pure aspiration
in this way: they should
not give rise
to the aspiration while abiding in form. They should not give rise to the
aspiration while abiding in
sound, odor,
taste, touch, or concepts. They should give rise to the aspiration while
not abiding in anything."
"Subh?ti, it is
like if there were a person with a body as large as Mt. Sumeru. What do
you think? Would this body
not be huge?"
"Extremely huge,
World Honored One. And why so? The Buddha teaches us that it is not a body.
Hence it is called
a huge body"
11. Merits of
memorizing this s?tra (#1)
"Subh?ti, if each
of the sands in the Ganges river contained its own Ganges river, would
not the number of sands
contained in
all those Ganges rivers be great?"
Subh?ti said,
"Extremely great, World Honored One. If the number of even the Ganges rivers
were countless, how
much more so
its grains of sand?"
"Subh?ti, now
I am going to tell you a truth. If a good son or good daughter filled three
thousand galaxies with the
seven jewels
equal to the number of grains of sand in all those Ganges rivers and gave
them away charitably, would
his or her merit
not be great?"
"Extremely great,
World Honored One."
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti: "If a good son or good daughter is able to memorize four lines
of verse from this s?tra
and teach them
to others, his or her merit will be far greater."
12. Merits of
memorizing this s?tra (#2)
"Furthermore,
Subh?ti, if someone were to recite as much as a four line verse of this
sutra, that place would
become like a
shrine to the Buddha, where the celestials, humans, and titans in all the
worlds would come and make
offerings. How
much more so in the case where one completely memorizes and recites the
sutra. Subh?ti, you
should know that
such a person has accomplished the most subtle state of awareness. Wherever
this sutra is kept,
the Buddha's
most revered disciples are also present."
13. Naming of
the s?tra
Then Subh?ti addressed
the Buddha, saying: "World Honored One, what should we call this scripture,
and how
should we practice
it?"
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti: "This scripture is called the Diamond of Transcendent Wisdom.
You should practice it
according to
this name. And why? That which the Buddha calls 'transcendent wisdom' is
not transcendent wisdom.
Subh?ti, what
does this mean? Does the tath?gata have a teaching to explain?"
Subh?ti said
to the Buddha, "World Honored One, the Tath?gata has no teaching to explain."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Are not the tiniest particles contained in the worlds of
three thousand galaxies great
in number?"
Subh?ti said,
"Extremely great in number, World Honored One."
"Subh?ti, the
Tath?gata teaches that tiny particles are not tiny particles. Therefore
they are called tiny particles.
The Tath?gata
teaches that worlds are not worlds. Therefore they are called worlds."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Can the Tath?gata be discerned by means of his thirty-two
bodily characteristics?"
"No, he cannot,
World Honored One. One cannot discern a Tath?gata by means of his thirty-two
bodily
characteristics.
And why not? Because the thirty-two bodily characteristics that are taught
by the Tath?gata are in
fact not characteristics.
Therefore they are called the thirty-two characteristics."
"Subh?ti, if
a good son or good daughter dedicates lifetimes as numerous as the sands
in the Ganges river to
charitable acts,
and there were another person who memorized as much as a four-line verse
of this scripture and
taught it to
others, the merit of the latter person would be by far greater."
14. True characteristics
are not characteristics
Then, Subh?ti,
having heard this sermon, deeply understood its point. He was moved to
tears, and said to the
Buddha: "It is
a rare treasure for us, World Honored One, that you have taught this profound
scripture. Since the
time long ago
when I attained the eye of insight, I have never had access to this sort
of teaching. World Honored
One, if someone
is able to hear this kind of scripture, purify his faith and thus [perceive]
the true characteristics of
things, we should
know that this person has attained the most rare kind of merit. World Honored
One, these true
characteristics
are actually not characteristics. Therefore the Tath?gata calls them true
characteristics."
"World Honored
One: Having presently heard the teaching of this scripture, I do not have
difficulty in adequately
grasping its
point. But if there is someone five hundred years hence who is able to
hear this scripture, and believe,
understand, and
commit it to memory, then this person will be most rare. Why? This person
will not be abiding in
the notion of
self, the notion of person, the notion of sentient being, or the notion
of life span. And why? Because
the notion of
self is not a notion. The notion of person, the notion of sentient being,
and the notion of life span are
also not notions.
And why? Those who are free from all notions are called buddhas."
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti: "Yes, yes. You are right. You should know that if someone hears
the teaching of this
scripture and
is neither shocked, afraid, or alarmed, this person is extremely rare.
And why? Subh?ti, what the
Tath?gata calls
the greatest transcendence, is not the greatest transcendence. Therefore
it is called the greatest
transcendence."
"Subh?ti, the
transcendent forbearance that I teach is not transcendent forbearance.
And why not? Subh?ti, in a
former lifetime
my body was cut into pieces by the R?jah Kali?ga. If, at that time, I was
not abiding in the notions
of self, person,
sentient being, or life span. And why not? If, at the time body was cut
into pieces, if I had been
holding to the
notions of self, person, sentient being, or life span, I would have felt
ill-will [toward Kali?ga]. Subh?ti,
I also remember
some five hundred lifetimes ago having practiced forbearance as a renunciant
sage.1 At that time
I was also free
from the notions of self, person, sentient being, and life. Therefore,
Subh?ti, the bodhisattvas should
free themselves
from all notions and arouse the aspiration for peerless perfect enlightenment.
They should not
arouse this aspiration
while abiding in form, and they should not arouse this aspiration while
abiding in sound, odor,
taste, touch,
or conceptualization. They should give rise to the aspiration that has
no abode. If the mind abides,
then this is
not abiding. Therefore I say that the mind of the bodhisattvas should not
abide in the form of charity."
"Subh?ti, when
a bodhisattva wants to confer benefit on all sentient beings, she should
practice charity like this. I
teach that all
notions are not notions. I also teach that all sentient beings are not
sentient beings. Subh?ti, my
words are true
— they are authentic, and they explain things they way they are. My words
are not deceptions, and
they are not
erroneous. Subh?ti, the dharma that I have attained, as a teaching, has
neither truth nor falsity.
Subh?ti, if a
bodhisattva practices charity while abiding in [notions of] the teaching,
it is like a person in the dark
who cannot see
anything. If a bodhisattva practices charity while not abiding in [notions
of] the teaching, it is like a
person with eyes
wide open in the sunlight, seeing all kinds of forms. Subh?ti, if, in a
future time there are good
sons and good
daughters who are able to memorize this scripture and recite it, then I
will, with my buddha-wisdom,
be fully aware
of these people, seeing each one of them, as each one attains countless,
limitless merit."
15. The s?tra
is not for lesser vehicle practitioners
"Subh?ti, suppose
there were a good son or good daughter who made dedications of his or her
life to charity in a
quantity equal
to the number of grains of sand in the Ganges, and in the middle of the
day made dedications of his
or her life to
charity in a quantity equal to the number of grains of sand in the Ganges,
and at the end of the day
also made dedications
of his or her life to charity in a quantity equal to the number of grains
of sand in the Ganges,
and made these
dedications of his or her life to charity in this way for immeasurable
hundreds of thousands of
billions of eons.
If, on the other hand, there were a person who heard the teaching of this
scripture with the mental
attitude of faith,
and did not doubt it, the merit of this person would exceed that of the
prior. How much more so in
the case of the
person who copies it, memorizes it, chants it, and explains it to others."
"Subh?ti, it can
be summarized like this: this scripture carries inconceivable, immeasurable,
limitless merit, and the
Tath?gata teaches
it to those who have entered into the great vehicle, and to those who have
entered into the
supreme vehicle.
Any person who is able to memorize, recite, and teach this scripture to
others is perceived by the
Tath?gata, and
is seen by the Tath?gata, and all attain innumerable, immeasurable, limitless,
inconceivable merit.
These people
are the carriers of the Tath?gata's peerless perfect enlightenment. And
why? Subh?ti, those who are
contented with
inferior teachings are attached to the view of self, the view of person,
the view of sentient being, and
the view of life
span. Such a person is not able to hear, understand, recite, and teach
this scripture to others.
Subh?ti, any
place where this scripture is present, all the gods, humans, and titans
in all the worlds will come and
make offerings.
You should know that such a place is equivalent to a shrine, where all
should venerate, pay
obeisance, and
circumambulate while scattering flowers and incense around the place."
16. Purgation
through suffering of bad karma
"Furthermore,
Subh?ti, if there is a good son or good daughter who memorizes and recites
this scripture, but is
belittled by
others, it is because this person committed crimes in a prior life which
resulted in negative rebirths.
Through enduring
the disparagement of others in the present life, the bad karma from the
prior lives can be
removed, and
one can attain peerless perfect enlightenment. Subh?ti, billions of countless
eons ago, before the
time of D?pa?kara
Buddha, I have encountered 84,000 billions of countless buddhas, serving
them and making
offerings to
them without lapse. If there is also a person in the final age who is able
to memorize and recite this
scripture, this
person's merit will be one hundred times, a hundred trillion times — nay,
an incalculable number of
times greater
than that which I gained when I made offerings to all these buddhas. "
"Subh?ti, if I
completely elucidated the merits to be gained by good sons and good daughters
in the final age who
memorize and
recite this scripture, there may be people who, upon its hearing, become
confused, suspicious, and
unbelieving.
Subh?ti, you should know that the underlying meaning of this s?tra is inconceivable,
and the results
[obtained from
its memorization and recitation] are also inconceivable."
17. Defining the
bodhisattva
Then Subh?ti addressed
the Buddha, saying: "World Honored One, if good sons and good daughters
would like to
arouse the aspiration
for peerless perfect enlightenment, in what should they mentally abide,
and how should they
gain mastery
over their thoughts?"
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti: "Good sons and good daughters who want to arouse the aspiration
for peerless
perfect enlightenment
should think like this: 'I will save all sentient beings.' Yet when all
sentient beings have been
liberated, in
fact, not a single sentient being has been liberated. And why not? Subh?ti,
if a bodhisattva holds the
notion of a self,
the notion of person, the notion of sentient being, and the notion of life
span, then she is not a
bodhisattva.
Why? Subh?ti, there is actually no such a thing as peerless perfect enlightenment."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? When the Tath?gata was with D?pa?kara Buddha, was there any
such a thing as
peerless perfect
enlightenment?"
"No, World Honored
One. As I understand the content of your teaching, when you were with D?pa?kara
Buddha,
there was no
thing as peerless perfect enlightenment."
The Buddha said,
"Correct, correct. Subh?ti, there is, in fact, no such thing as the attainment
of peerless perfect
enlightenment
by the Tath?gata. Subh?ti, if there were such as thing as the attainment
of peerless perfect
enlightenment
by the Tath?gata, D?pa?kara Buddha would not have conferred upon me the
prediction of
attainment of
buddhahood, saying, 'You will attain buddhahood in the future, with the
name ??kyamuni.' It is
precisely because
there is actually no such thing as the attainment of peerless perfect enlightenment,
that
D?pa?kara Buddha
conferred the prediction of buddhahood upon me, saying, 'You will attain
buddhahood in the
future, with
the name ??kyamuni.' "
"And why? Because
'Tathagata' means 'all phenomena (dharmas) as they really are.' Subh?ti,
if someone says that
the Tath?gata
attains peerless perfect enlightenment, there is in fact, no such thing
as the Buddha attaining
peerless perfect
enlightenment. Subh?ti, the peerless perfect enlightenment attained by
the Tath?gata is neither
real nor unreal.
Therefore the Tath?gata teaches that all dharmas are the buddhadharma.
Subh?ti, those things
that are described
as 'all dharmas' are not all dharmas. Therefore they are called 'all dharmas.'
"
"Subh?ti, please
take, for example, the case of a large human body."
Subh?ti said,
"World Honored One, the large human body that you have mentioned is not
a large body; therefore it
is called a large
body."
"Subh?ti, it
is the same with a bodhisattva. If he says, 'I will save numberless sentient
beings,' then he is not a
bodhisattva.
Why? Subh?ti, there is actually no such state called bodhisattvahood. Therefore
I say that all
phenomena have
no self, no personality, no sentient beingness, and no life span. Subh?ti,
if a bodhisattva says 'I
will adorn buddha-lands,'
I would not call this person a bodhisattva. Why? What the Tath?gata has
called
adornment of
buddha-lands is not adornment. Therefore it is called adornment. Subh?ti,
if a bodhisattva realizes
the selflessness
of phenomena, the Tath?gata calls this person a real bodhisattva."
18. Physical and
mental faculties are unobtainable
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Tath?gata have the physical eye?"
"Yes, World Honored
One. The Tath?gata has the physical eye."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Tath?gata have the divine eye?"
"Yes, World Honored
One, the Tath?gata has the divine eye."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Tath?gata have the wisdom eye?"
"Yes, World Honored
One, the Tath?gata has the wisdom eye."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Tath?gata have the dharma eye?"
"Yes, World Honored
One. The Tath?gata has the dharma eye?"
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Does the Tath?gata have the buddha eye?"
"Yes, World Honored
One. The Tath?gata has the buddha eye."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? When discussing the sands in Ganges river, the Buddha calls
these 'sands,' does he
not?"
"Yes, World Honored
One, the Tath?gata calls them 'sands.' "
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? If each of the sands in the one Ganges river each contained
its own Ganges river, and
each grain of
sand in all these Ganges rivers represented a buddha-world, would not their
number be many?"
"Very many, World
Honored One."
The Buddha said
to Subh?ti: "The Tath?gata is fully aware of the various thoughts of each
of the sentient beings
dwelling in these
buddha worlds. And how so? None of what the Tath?gata calls 'thoughts'
are actually thoughts.
Therefore they
are called thoughts. Why? Because the past thought is unobtainable, the
present thought is
unobtainable,
and the future thought is unobtainable."
19. No merit is
great merit
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? If there were a person who was able to take enough of the
seven jewels to fill all the
worlds of the
three galaxies, and gave them away for charity, would not, based on these
causes and conditions, this
person's merit
be great?"
"Yes, World Honored
One, based on these causes and conditions this person's merit would be
extremely great."
"Subh?ti, if
this merit were real, the Tath?gata would not say that there was attainment
of great merit. It is
because this
merit is non-existent that the Tath?gata says that the merit is great."
20. Discerning
the Buddha by his body
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Can the Buddha be discerned by seeing his perfectly-formed
body?"
"No, World Honored
One. The Tath?gata cannot be discerned by seeing his perfectly-formed body.
Why? What
the Tath?gata
calls a perfectly-formed body is not a perfectly-formed body. Hence it
is called a perfectly-formed
body."
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Can the Tath?gata be discerned by his perfect bodily characteristics?"
"No, World Honored
One. The Tath?gata cannot be discerned by his perfect bodily characteristics.
Why? Those
characteristics
that the Tath?gata has called 'perfect' are actually not perfect. Therefore
he says that these
characteristics
are perfect."
21. No dharma
is dharma; non-sentient beings are sentient beings
Subh?ti, do not
think such a thought as "I [the Tath?gata] have something to teach." Do
not even think such a
thing. Why not?
If someone says that the Tath?gata has a teaching to offer then he is slandering
the Buddha,
because he does
not understand what I am teaching. Subh?ti, in the teaching of the dharma,
there is no dharma that
can be taught.
This is called teaching the dharma.
Then Insight-Life
Subh?ti said to the Buddha: "World Honored One. Might there at some time
in the future be
sentient beings
who will gain faith upon hearing this discourse?"
The Buddha said,
"Subh?ti, they will not be sentient beings, and they will not be non-sentient
beings. Why?
Subh?ti, the
Tath?gata has taught that 'sentient beings' are not sentient beings. Thus
they are called sentient
beings."
22. The attainability
of peerless perfect enlightenment
Subh?ti said to
the Buddha: "World Honored One. When the buddhas attain peerless perfect
enlightenment, is it
the case that
actually nothing is attained?"
"Exactly right.
Subh?ti, as far as peerless perfect enlightenment is concerned, I have
not attained the slightest
thing. This is
why it is called peerless perfect enlightenment."
23. The role of
good factors
"Furthermore,
Subh?ti, this state is equal, have neither high or low. Therefore it is
called peerless perfect
enlightenment.
When one, not abiding in the notions of self, person, sentient being, and
lifespan, cultivates all kinds
of good factors,
then one attains peerless perfect enlightenment. Subh?ti, the Tath?gata
says that these so-called
'good factors'
are not good factors. Therefore they are called good factors."
24. Merits of
transmitting the s?tra: far greater than those of charity
"Subh?ti, if there
were a person who accumulated the seven jewels in mounds equivalent to
all the Mt. Sumerus in
the worlds of
three thousand galaxies and gave them away charitably, the merit gained
by such a person, compared
to that of someone
who memorized, recited, and explained to others as much as a four-line
verse of this scripture of
transcendent
wisdom, would not amount to a hundredth. Nor would it amount to billionth
part. In fact, no metaphor
of number is
capable of describing this difference in merit."
25. No sentient
beings for the Tath?gata to save
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? You should not claim that the Tath?gata thinks 'I will save
sentient beings.' Subh?ti,
do not think
such a thing. Why? There are in fact no sentient beings for the Tath?gata
to save. If there were
sentient beings
for the Tath?gata to save, it would mean that the Tath?gata holds the notions
of self, person,
sentient being,
and life span. Subh?ti, when the Tath?gata says 'I,' there is actually
no ' I.' Yet immature beings
take this to
be an I. Subh?ti, as far as immature beings are concerned, the Tath?gata
says that they are not
immature beings."
26. Trying to
discern the Buddha by his bodily characteristics
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? Can one discern the Tath?gata by means of the thirty-two
bodily characteristics?"
Subh?ti said,
"Yes, yes. One discerns the Tath?gata by means of the thirty-two bodily
characteristics."
The Buddha said,
"Subh?ti, if one discerns the Tath?gata by means of the thirty-two bodily
characteristics, then
the wheel-turning
sage kings (temporal rulers) are Tath?gatas."
Subh?ti said
to the Buddha, "World Honored One, as I understand the gist of what you
have said, one should not
try to discern
the Tath?gata by means of the thirty-two bodily characteristics."
Then the World
Honored One spoke in a verse:
Someone who tries
to discern me in form
Or seek me in
sound
Is practicing
non-Buddhist methods
And will not
discern the Tath?gata
27. Attainment
of enlightenment based on bodily characteristics
"Subh?ti, if you
think that the Tath?gata attains peerless perfect enlightenment based on
the perfection of bodily
characteristics,
then, Subh?ti, you should not think like this, because the Tath?gata does
not attain peerless perfect
enlightenment
based on the perfection of bodily characteristics. Subh?ti, if you think
that one who gives rise to
peerless perfect
enlightenment claims the extinction of all marks of phenomena, you should
not think like this.
Why? The person
who gives rise to the intention for peerless perfect enlightenment does
not claim the extinction of
the marks of
phenomena."
28. Bodhisattvas
do not appropriate merit
"Subh?ti, if a
bodhisattva filled worlds as many as the grains of sand in the Ganges river,
and another bodhisattva
perfected his
forbearance based on the awareness of the selflessness of all phenomena,
the merit gained by this
bodhisattva would
exceed that of the former. Subh?ti, this is because the bodhisattvas do
not experience merit."
Subh?ti said
to the Buddha: "World Honored One, how is it that the bodhisattva does
not experience merit?"
"Subh?ti, the
merit generated by the bodhisattvas is not to be appropriated by them.
Therefore I say that they do
not experience
merit."
29. The Thus-come
One doesn't come or go
"Subh?ti, if someone
says that the Tath?gata ( 'Thus-come One' ) comes, goes, sits, or lies
down, this person does
not understand
the point of my teaching. Why? The Thus-come One has no place from whence
he comes, and no
place to go.
Therefore he is called 'Thus-come.' "
30. The status
of composite things
"Subh?ti, what
do you think? If a good son or good daughter were to take all the worlds
contained in three
thousand galaxies
and crush them into tiny particles, would these particles not be numerous?"
"Extremely numerous,
World Honored One. And why? If these numerous tiny particles had real existence,
the
Buddha would
not call them numerous tiny particles. What does this mean? Those things
that the Buddha calls
'numerous tiny
particles' are not numerous tiny particles. Therefore they are called numerous
tiny particles. World
Honored One.
That which the Tath?gata calls 'all the worlds in three thousand galaxies'
are actually not worlds.
Therefore they
are called worlds. Why? To the extent that these worlds really exist, they
do so as a composite. The
Tath?gata teaches
that composites are not composites. Therefore they are called composites."
"Subh?ti, a composite
is something that is ineffable. Only immature beings attach to such phenomena."
31. Wrapping up
the four views
"Subh?ti, if someone
claims that I teach the view of self, view of person, view of sentient
being, or view of life span,
what would you
say? Has this person understood the point of my teaching?"
"World Honored
One, this person has not understood the point of the Tath?gata's teaching.
Why? What the World
Honored One has
explained as the view of self, view of person, view of sentient being,
and view of life span, are
actually not
a view of self, view of person, view of sentient being, or view of life
span. Therefore they are called
view of self,
view of person, view of sentient being, and view of life span."
"Subh?ti, the
person who gives rise to the aspiration for peerless perfect enlightenment,
should, in regard to all
phenomena, think
like this, discern like this, and believe and understand like this. One
should not give rise to signs
for phenomena.
Subh?ti, the Tath?gata has explained that these so-called signs of phenomena
are precisely not
signs of phenomena.
Therefore they are called signs of phenomena."
32. Conclusion
Subh?ti, if there
were a person who took the amount of the seven jewels in numberless, countless
worlds and gave
them away charitably,
and there were also a good son or good daughter who gave rise to the bodhisattva's
aspiration, taking
just a four line verse of this scripture, memorizing it, reciting it, and
teaching it to others, this
person's merit
would exceed that of the former. How should one teach it to others? Without
grasping to signs,
staying with
things as they are, immovable. Why?
All conditioned
phenomena
Are like a dream,
an illusion, a bubble, a shadow
Like the dew,
or like lightning
You should discern
them like this
The Buddha concluded
his delivery of this scripture. The elder Subh?ti, along with all the other
monks, nuns, male
and female lay
practitioners, all the worlds of celestials, men, and titans, having heard
this teaching of the Buddha,
experienced great
bliss. They believed, memorized, and practiced according to the Scripture
of the Diamond
Transcendent
Wisdom Scripture.
Copyright
© Charles Muller— 2004
|